BS”D
Naso
– Food for Thought for Body and Soul
Dr M Banks
H spoke to Moshe saying speak to Aaron and his sons saying, to them, so shall you bless the children of Aaron, saying …
This is the Birkas Cohanim. There are amazing ideas and insights into birkas cohanim and stemming from this, in the parsha as a whole.
We see at the beginning of the parsha that the responsibilities of the Leviim, the divisions of his sons, Merari and Gershon. The work of the Mishcan, how to purify the tent from Loshon Hora, from the Tuma of Nida, and also Tumas Mes. Then it goes on to how a Jew ‘tikuns’ theft. These seem a little bit disjointed, has vehalila, without a particular form. We go into something very serious after this called Sota. This corresponds to a maseches in Shas called Maseches Sota. There is also a maseches called maseches Nazir, the Nazirite, about vows that a person might take. In amongst all this is the Priestly Blessing. Then to cap it all off, there is the offering given by the tribal leaders which is an incredible insight. The head of each tribe seem to bring exactly the same offering. Every one of these offerings is individually spelt out. It seems that this is so precious to H’ that it is recorded for all time.
Another thing to contemplate is the power of Birchas Cohanim.
How precious is the secret that H gives over to Am Yisrael. The Gemora discuses this in Brochos 20b. H will raise his face to you, favour you so to speak, and grant you peace (Perek 6, posuk 26). The Angels asked, how could it say such a thing in the Torah when elsewhere, in parshas Ekev, the Torah explicitly says H’ doesn’t favour anyone, nor does he accept a bribe. So how can it be that all of a sudden H does favour someone, the Cohanim and Am Yisrael? To which H replies, shall I not favour Israel, who say Birchas Hamazon after eating a Kazayis (an olive’s bulk) or Kabeitza (the size of an egg) even though I wrote in my Torah you must be satisfied, ‘veachalta vesavata’. Even over this small amount, the Nation insists on blessing H’ in birchas hamazon. Even a Kazayis or Kabeitza is puzzling, asks the Gra, the Vilna Gaon, for a number of reasons. If they bless H over a Kazayis, why mention a kabeitza? Why mention both? Can it be that there is a safek in the eyes of H’? Rashi explains that this is a dispute between Rabbi Meir and Rabbi Yehuda, who agree that one says Birchas Hamazon even if one is not satisfied, but argue whether the shir is a kazayis or kabeitza. This refers to two different people following two opinions in which case both are answered. A young person who is small can be satiated over a kazayis. A big person might have a safek on a smaller amount, but if he has eaten a kabeitza, there is no safek even for him, even if he is still hungry. There were shocking shailas asked during the Holocaust, what brocho to make if people are starving and have less than a kabeitza for the whole day, and what brocho to make before dying for the sake of sanctifying H’s name. These terrifying questions were asked during the Shoah. The Gra explains further, even regarding one person, just as it is forbidden to eat without a brocho, it is forbidden to cause an unnecessary brocho. H is saying that Bnei Yisrael are very careful to eat a kazayis in onrder to be able to say birchas hamazon, even if that is all they have. If they have more, according to Rabbi Yehuda, they should eat a kabeitza so that they can avoid any possibility of a brocho levatala. A person who has a kabeitza has a hiyuv d’oraisa to say birchas hamazon.
I want to explore the concept of brocho d’oraisa.
The Torah has only two places where it commands we should
say a brocho. Obviously form this introduction,
it is clear from parshas Devarim
10, 10 that Brichas Hamazon
is D’oraisa. The D’oraisa
part says, veachalta, vesavata
uverachta, which means we should be satisfied and
bless H’. What is the natural response, to bless H for the good food. Thank you H’, I’ve just been afforded another day of
life. It could be their only meal of the day, in a concentration camp or soup
kitchen anywhere in the world. Even if a person has had a huge meal, H commands
him to eat and to say a brocho for the food. What is
that brocho – veachalta, vesavata uverachta al ha’aretz hatova asher nasan
lach. A person could eat a standard burger in
The other brocho that is D’oraisa is Brichas Hatora. The question goes out, which brocho
on the Torah is d’oraisa? The first
or second – the one before or after, when somebody is called up to the Torah.
It turns out that it is the first one. This is a curiosity because I would
imagine that once a person has finished learning for the day he would say to
himself, wow this Torah that I have learnt is a new insight into the world. I
am eternally grateful for this new joy that H has revealed to me. Surely a
person should bless after he has learnt Torah. It turns out that D’oraisa he has to bless H before he starts learning.
Imagine a professor at University. Imagine a professor in University tests his
students. He asks how many Jews were there at
If the birchos Hatora d’Oraisa is the first one, with food, with bread, which is D’oraisa? Before or after the meal? Surely you should know where the food comes from. If you want to teach a person a lesson in being thankful, you could invite him to your home. When he gets there, you hold up a gorgeous meal and say, the only way you can have this is if you wash your hands before and say the following blessing. He is half starving and hasn’t eaten in a week. Is it likely he is going to argue? Especially if you are the only home in 1000km. He will say whatever you want. But, once you are satisfied, once you have eaten, you might say, lets talk about this. He might say, now comes the real brocho, ‘see you later’ and he is out the door. That was the mida of Eisav. When Yaakov gave him the lentil soup, he stood up, turned his back and walked out. He didn’t bench. He turned his back on the birthright and left forever. That is the tragedy of somebody who doesn’t say birchas hamazon with kavana.
He should be grateful to H not just for the food but, d’Oraisa, for the good land. He is really satisfied and had his fill of that the world has to offer him. You should never forget that 2/3rds of Torah cannot be performed outside the Land. Outside Eretz Yisrael 80%, historically, have not survived. That is the great hospitality of Esav and Yishmael. In each generation 8 out of 10 are either murdered or shmaded. A person should never feel so cosy and say this is such a geschmack galus, I have 2 homes, 2 cars, an overflow of everything gashmius I could wish for, and the tragedy is that his children marry out. The epicenter of his existence in this world, the trial, upon which his neshama will stand judgment in shamayim, are his children, and they married out. It is like his neshama has gone. It has self destructed.
Now we have started to explore an insight into the power of a brocho. What happens when a person is not so gracious and grateful. The Torah talks about the meal offering given by the husband of the Sotah, a woman suspected of having an adulterous relationship with somebody that she was previously warned not to be in seclusion with. There are witnesses and the matter comes before Beis Din. She now has to go before the cohen in the Beis Hamikdash and a whole explanation is given. What happened? Rashi explains that the chapter of Sotah follows the priestly gifts. This teaches that if somebody is too mean spirited to give to the Cohen what is due to him, his Trumos and Trumos Maaseros, that person will be forced to come before the Cohen to perform the procedure of Sotah. In the end he has to come before the Cohen to perform the opposite of a peace offering. Just as the meal offering disintegrates, so he sees his world disintegrate.
The Sotah process is as follows. A
man and a woman have been secluded in such a way for sufficient time so that
they could have committed a sin. Early impropriety have touched the heart o the
husband and he becomes suspicious of his wife and this other man. He has warned
her not to seclude herself with that person but she ignored the warning. Two
witnesses see them together and the opportunity for them to commit adultery was
real. They didn’t see whether they did commit adultery, but they saw that she
was secluded. If she had been overpowered against her will, of course she would
be innocent and the man would be guilty. The aggrieved husband has to bring a
meal offering on behalf of his wife. Whereas the ordinary offering is to bring
mercy and forgiveness, this one is a reminder of the sin that she is accused of
committing and at the very least for having secluded herself, arousing the
suspicion of her husband, the witnesses and the community in general. For that
reason the husband has to bring the offering, not the wife, because it would
not be proper for her to bring an offering which would evoke H’s anger against
her. This is according to the Ramban. The offering
represented its purpose and symbolism. It was coarse barley flower. Coarse – because of the coarse behaviour.
Barley – because this is food for animals and she behaved in a way that could
possibly have been even worse than an animal. It is not beautified by oil or
frankincense like all other meal offerings. The frankincense recalls the
fragrance of our fore-mothers. The oil symbolizes the light given in the Menora, which lit up the world with the light of Torah. She
did not follow in the way of the matriarchs and acted in the dark literally and
figuratively, to try to hide her sin. This is an offering of jealousies, in the
plural, because she has earned the resentment and derision of her husband and
her Creator. This is according to Rashi. What happens
to her now is quite frightening. Because of the gravity of the accusations and
what the consequences are if she is found guilty, attempts are physically made
to persuade her to confess. Although she would not be convicted due to the lack
of evidence, pressure is put upon her to achieve her confession. If she refuses
to confess, she undergoes the potentially lethal ordeal which releases her from
judgment, if she is innocent. The sacred waters are drawn from the
You see something absolutely awesome. In the Mishna of Maseches Sota 20a, this is the only judicial process in the Torah
that depends on an absolute supernatural intervention of H himself. It was a miracle that continued perpetually as long as the majority
of Bnei Yisroel had Yiras H’ and H’s presence in their midst. This was
discontinued by the Sanhedrin at the time of the destruction of the
In those conditions, if that is not the case, then her womb would explode in a most grotesque way, and her name would be an example to all others, that, lest they fool themselves, into thinking that there would be no Din Sota, for them, they wouldn’t dare to do such a crazy thing after seeing that this actually came to fruition. This would cure the infidelity that may lurk in a tiny percentage of the nation. This didn’t just befall the woman. Incredibly, the same punishment befell the man with whom she sinned.
H’s name is written in its entirety. Ordinarily it is forbidden to erase the sacred name of H’. one who does so is liable to lashes (Rambam, Hilchos Yesdoei HaTorah 6, 1-2). H commanded that his name be erased in order to bring peace between man and wife (Yerushalmi, Sotah 1.4). This demonstrates just how precious Shalom Bayis is to H’. He would be willing to have his name desecrated for Shalom Bayis to continue.
At this point the parsha goes on to the inyan of a person who takes a nazirite vow of abstinence for H’. From all manner of wine he shall abstain. He shall not drink vinegar or wine, nor dried grapes. Anything made from grapes, even the pips or the skins, he shall not eat. All the days of his nazirite vow a razor shall not pass over his head, until the completion of his days, he will be a nazirite for the sake of H’. Holy shall he be. The growth of hair on his head shall grow all the days of his abstinence, for the sake of H’. He shall not come near to a dead person. For his father, mother, brother, or sister he shall not contaminate himself upon their death for the crown of H is upon his head. All the days of his abstinence he is holy to H. Why does the Torah describe the Nazirite vow after the Sota vow. How is one related to the other? The answer, according to Maseches Sota 22a/b, is that the Sages derive that one who sees the Sota in a state of denigration and possibly seeing that her womb explodes afterwards, he is so shocked that he decides to prohibit wine from himself, and takes a nazirite vow. The Sota opted to follow her potential passions, and let these overwhelm her mind and her heart. The pursuit of pleasure overcame her responsibility and dedication to H’. Her experience was proof that people are easy prey to temptation. That way the evil inclination flares up within a person, even adultery can be seen as an acceptable option for a moment. Somebody who saw her denigration, even her horrible death after she drank from the bitter waters, could easily be overcome by the fear and the terror. One should abstain from wine and from the impulses that lead to the loose lifestyle that leads to the behaviour that the Sota pursued. What was it? That she gave her lover from wine. That loosened his morals, her morals, in a process that loosened their helek in Olam Haba. The Nazirite’s abstention from wine signals that the nazirite is so shocked that he adopts the spiritual lifestyle that can help close the door to any of these temptations that doomed the Sota and her lover. In a way he makes a tikun for that which started off the whole process, the wine that loosened up the morals that was taken as an act of the personal pursuit of pleasure. The pursuit of one’s own hedonistic happiness, pleasure without boundaries, ultimately removes a person from this world and the next. So we see that the nazirite in an attempt to be metaken the Sota, dedicates his life, or that portion of his life that he feels is necessary, so that he will never be tempted by the temptation which brought about the downfall of the Sota and her lover.
Returning to where we began, the Birchas
Cohanim, reminds us to count our blessings. The
ultimate priestly gift is Birchas Cohanim.
Moses was commanded to tell the Cohanim that would be
privileged to bless the people of
Pidyon shvua is securing the release of a prisoner, who is trapped against his will. The ultimate return of a lost object or pidyon shvua, release of person that is trapped, is to return a brother who has lost his way. Or, a brother who has been captured by the goyim physically or spiritually. After having found him and nurtured him through tshuva, back to life, returning him to shlemut, completeness, with the help of H’. What appreciation does a father have for one son who finds his brother trapped by enemies in a very dangerous cave, filled with snakes and scorpions. His brother every second was on the verge of death. The other brother troubles himself to save him from any possible situation to rescue him and bring him home to Torah, Eretz Yisroel and Olam Haba be Olam Haze. So we see, from the Birchas Cohanim, that the shlemut of the Cohen and the shlemut of the nation can be used to transmit and receive H’s blessing.
Why is Birchas cohanim
every day in
For example a person wins the lotto. 40 million shekels. He goes there, his picture is in the papers as the person that won the lotto. Why do people always have a bag over their head when they win the lotto – so that nobody comes to rob them. Imagine the guy comes out of the lotto centre with his bag of 40 million shekels, walks round the corner and somebody is standing there with a machine gun. He says “hand over that suitcase that you have in your right hand. And by the way, have a good day”. How does that person feel when they see that 40 million shekels disappear into the dark? What would you say? What is his emotion? That was unlimited potential for the rest of his life. He never had to worry where his next meal, his next home, his next charitable project – where it would be funded. For the rest of his life he could never spend all this money. In one second somebody else disappears with his brocho. What does he feel? Devastation. Total devastation. Wait a second. 5 minutes before he didn’t have the money. Before he knew that he had one, it could be one digit different; he wouldn’t feel an ounce of remorse. Chaval, I missed it by a number, he wouldn’t feel any devastation. What’s happened here? What happened is that his brocho that he had for all of one minute was taken away from him. All of a sudden he feels the devastation that he never felt in his life before. All that infinite potential. It was with him for a second and is gone for eternity. How he would regret that for the rest of his life. Maybe he should have hired the top security company, to come and help him deposit it in the bank. Maybe he should have had an armed team of soldiers coming with – 15, 20, 100 guys with machine guns marching him all the way to the bank. Maybe he should have insisted on a crossed cheque that nobody else could deposit. Ein Sof Ledavar.
From this we see the incredible nature of a brocho levotolo, a blessing that you may heaven forbid say without kavana. And, midda keneged midda, a blessing that H may give us that we are not zoche to. We have to tremble that not only is our blessing a blessing, but that we should also be zoche to the yishmerecha, H’s protection.
In HaMek Dvar,
the Netziv notes that H’s blessing is a general one.
It does not clarify what sort of increase is meant. The exact form of blessing
must depend on the needs of each individual. A real blessing is when H gives a
person what he needs, not what he perceives he needs. Not what he greeds, but what he really needs. There is a famous saying
that people who stay too long suffer from one of 2 conditions, when they clung
to certain places in world history, because of their tremendous wealth – like
the tragedy of what happened in
The blessing of prosperity is a blessing only H can guarantee you. A King, of flesh and blood, who gives a huge gift to his servants, cannot guard it against danger. Even if armed guards are there, there may be even bigger armed robbers who take it away after murdering the guards. What good would it be to the recipient to see all his guards murdered and to see the blessing taken out of his hand. By their very nature, physical beings are fragile. No business or tangible assets are permanent or unchangeable. Nor is the character and the ambition of the human being consistent. Therefore we plead for H’s blessing of protection so that once given, His blessing will not fade away, according to the Malbim. It will be eternal. May H bless you with wealth and protect you so that you use the money for mitzvos. For as the Sages teach in many places, the best way for a person to preserve his wealth is to use it for charity and good deeds. This assures him H’s continuous blessing according to the Yalkut Yehuda. All the blessings function like this.
The essence of our blessings is the trumos
and ma’aser. These are the salt
that preserve the blessing. There is an amazing story of a man, when
post offices began over a hundred years ago. This man wanted to send a carton
across the world so he took it to the Post Office. The clerk started licking
some sticky pieces of paper and sticking them on his parcel. He started
screaming at him – what do you think your doing? Your adding
weight to my parcel. I didn’t allow that. So the postman took the stamps
right off. What happened to that parcel? Nothing – it never
left. What does that teach us? With that stamp, our parnassah
and all our brochos fly;
with chessed and tzedaka olam yibane. Our world was
established, with the birchas cohanim
as a vessel for brocho to flow into the world. H
continues to bless us according to our needs and according to our deeds. Now
all of a udden we have a
choice to remain in Galus, building pyramids for the
pharaohs or to come back to